Pages Navigation Menu

Most Recent Articles

Leadsom Admits Uncertainty Over Post-Brexit Environmental Laws

Posted by on Nov 21, 2016 in Environmental Laws | Comments Off on Leadsom Admits Uncertainty Over Post-Brexit Environmental Laws

Appearing before the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) at an earlier time today (25 October) in a public hearing for the Committee’s continuous query into the future of Britain’s natural surroundings after the EU referendum, Leadsom insisted that she remained “definitely dedicated to a smooth shift”.

The South Northamptonshire MP grew significantly angry over ideas that the Great Repeal Act – which will reverse the supremacy of all existing EU law over the UK’s own law – would successfully water down the UK’s ecological ambitions.

” As far as attainable, we will be bringing all EU legislation into UK law, and at first look, it appears that will be feasible to do between two-thirds and three-quarters of legislation,” Leadsom told fellow MPs. “That’s not to say there is some ulterior intention; it’s simply to say that an excellent deal of it will be fairly straightforward to bring into UK law. Find more information about marketing law firms.

” There is roughly a quarter that can never be brought right away into law either because it needs technical attention or falls away, and that’s the bit we will be looking at to see what steps need to be taken.”.

‘ Great convenience’

Throughout a dynamic conversation, the Defra Secretary increasingly rejected claims that Brexit would produce an unpredictable ecological outlook for the UK, echoing prior claims by Resource Minister Therese Coffey that the Conservative administration will “leave the environment in a better state than we found it”.

Leadsom singled out the Government’s recent action to improve marine conservation zones and stage out microbeads from cosmetics items as clear examples of ongoing worldwide leadership on environmental concerns. Companies would be assured by the certainty offered by the Government’s clear agenda to negotiate its EU departure, Leadsom asserted.

” In terms of continuity for companies, whether they are farmers or environmental groups attempting to work towards a goal in the UK, I believe the certainty of the Great Repeal Bill will come as great comfort to them.

” The essential point for certainty for business is that we make it clear is that nothing will alter unless it needs to on day one. And after that, over a duration of time, we will be able to rescind, modify, and enhance laws at leisure.”.


With around 25% of all EU legislation currently directly influencing on the Defra ministry, environmental advocates have continually stressed the value that rules safeguarding Britain’s natural surroundings “are not lost” during and after Brexit settlements.

The EAC revealed its own concern over the Defra’s apparent lack of a long-lasting method towards air quality, with stats suggesting that hazardous air contamination is claiming 10s of thousands of UK lives a year. Leadsom chose not to be made use of which subject locations would be moved into UK law following the Great Repeal Act, however, preserved that air quality remains a “top concern” for Government, along with development surrounding water quality reforestation as well as flood defense.

Later in the discussion, Leadsom verified that the frameworks for the 2 different 25-year environment and food & farming strategies will be introduced “within the next few months,” but she was not prepared to supply a precise date for either. At the suggestion of the “madness” that the plans will be handled in isolation, Leadsom firmly insisted that the establishment of 2 different paths was “definitely the ideal thing to do”.

Farming subsidies

The other day, the National Audit Office (NAO) released an upgrade on the development of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Delivery Program – the soon-to-be-scrapped EU legislation which has courted considerable debate for victimizing non-EU imports and holding back sustainable development. The upgrade focused mostly on standard payment plan payments to English farmers and landowners, which totaled ₤ 1.39 bn as much as this month.

Today, the EAC called upon Leadsom – who when infamously decried public aids to UK farmers – to make sure that any replacement for CAP payment schemes focuses more on public items. In action, Leadsom insisted that she wanted to preserve a balance in between the ecological outlook and food production. “I wish to see ecological products being a focus,” she said. “But at the very same time, food and farming is an extremely important economic sector, and we want to see more innovation, more food production, and more promotion of the Great British brand.

” But this need to come in a way that advances and enhances the environment. That would be the real sweet area.”.

Read More

Iraq’s Parliament Passes Law Prohibiting Alcohol

Posted by on Nov 21, 2016 in law | Comments Off on Iraq’s Parliament Passes Law Prohibiting Alcohol

Iraq’s parliament has passed a law forbidding the import, production or selling of alcoholic drinks in a surprise relocation that angered lots of in the country’s Christian neighborhood who depend on the business.

The law, completed late on Saturday night, enforces a fine of up to 25m Iraqi dinars (₤ 17,000) for anyone violating the ban. It’s uncertain how strictly the law would be imposed, and it might be struck down by the supreme court.

Islam forbids the intake of alcohol, but it has constantly been readily available in Iraq’s larger cities, primarily from shops run by Christians. Those shops are presently closed because of the Shia holy month of Muharram.

Iraq’s parliament is controlled by Shia Islamist celebrations. The assembly announced the ban on its site but did not say the number of lawmakers voted for or against it.

Christian legislator Joseph Slaiwa said the “unjustified” ban was slipped into a draft law managing the income of local authorities without legislators being informed. The initial article just called for enforcing taxes on liquor stores and restaurants serving alcohol, he stated.

” This restriction is unconstitutional, as the constitution recognizes the rights of non-Muslim minorities and ethnic groups who live alongside Muslims in Iraq,” he stated. “To those Muslim lawmakers, I say: ‘Take care of your faith and leave ours for us, we understand how to handle it’.”.

He said some legislators will send an appeal to the high federal court.

The expense was proposed by Mahmoud al-Hassan, a judge, and lawmaker from the State of Law union, the largest bloc in parliament. He insisted it was in keeping with article 2 of the constitution, which forbids any legislation that goes against Islam.

” The constitution protects democracy and the rights of non-Muslim groups, but these rights should not break the religion of Islam,” he said. “Some of the lawmakers’ vote was religiously inspired, but numerous others voted to avoid anything unconstitutional.”.

Kirk Sowell, the publisher of the biweekly newsletter Inside Iraqi Politics, said the costs was clearly supported by Shia Islamists but came “as a bit of a surprise because it has not been a subject of major dispute or conversation”.

He stated the executive branch could transfer to have the law overturned on procedural or other premises, and the supreme court might strike it down.

Other Muslim-majority nations have laws limiting alcohol, but just a couple of, consisting of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, enforce a total restriction. The Iraqi law was unlikely to be enforced in the mostly self-governing Kurdish area, which is home to a considerable Christian community.

The expense comes as Iraq is waging an enormous military operation to take back the northern city of Mosul from the Islamic State group. Isis completely imposes a restriction on alcohol, cigarettes and other drugs in the area under its control.

Iraqis debated the alcohol restriction on social networks, with lots of criticizing legislators for disregarding more pressing issues, such as the war against Isis, an economic crisis brought on by low oil rates, and the government’s own corruption and paralysis. An animation flowed online revealing guys with their backs switched on Mosul, shooting a bottle of alcohol.

Others revealed support for the restriction and applauded parliament for lining up the country’s laws with Islamic teachings.

Read More

Government Might Pass a Law Leading the Way for Britain to Leave the European Union Within Weeks

Posted by on Nov 21, 2016 in law | Comments Off on Government Might Pass a Law Leading the Way for Britain to Leave the European Union Within Weeks

The Government could pass a law paving the way for Britain to leave the European Union throughout weeks, and not wait on a Supreme Court ruling, ministers have recommended.

David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, confessed that legislation might go through Parliament prior to the Supreme Court decides whether to uphold a High Court ruling that Parliament should have a say on the moment Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty is triggered.

The news came as Theresa May, the Prime Minister, admitted that the Supreme Court could dictate whether the degree of scrutiny MPs and peers will have if the Government loses its appeal.

MPs put pressure on Mr. Davis to speed up the Brexit procedure in the wake of the High Court judgment that MPs and peers should have a vote on when to trigger the UK’s withdrawal from the EU.

Nicky Morgan, the former Education secretary, advised Mr. Davis in a Commons argument to agree to a “one line Bill licensing the triggering of Article 50”.

Mr. Davis admitted that he was “extremely tempted”, before including: “We do have to finish the tests in the court that are required to establish the law.”.

Oliver Letwin, the former Cabinet Office minister, likewise asked if Mr. Davis “agreed that due to that it would be possible for both Houses of Parliament to amend their treatments in such as way regarding bring forward an Act and Bill, and to pass that long prior the Supreme Court judgment”. Mr. Davis responded: “Yes.”.

Sources near to Mr. Davis stressed later that Mr. Davis and the Government remained focused on winning the interest the Supreme Court.

Mr. Davis stated he “deplored” the attacks on Gina Miller, the female who led the historic Brexit lawsuit, and suggested the abuse was “criminal”.

He stated: “They sound to me to be effectively criminal attacks, just because incitement of violence, hazards of violence, racial abuse, are all criminal activities.”.

The Brexit Secretary also struck out at attempts by Labor MPs to secure a second referendum and declared that they were trying to “wreck” Brexit.

Read More

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This